ILLUSTRATIVE REPORT STRUCTURE · NO CUSTOMER RESULTS

Model & Data
Readiness Review

A sample of the evidence to agree for a focused pilot. This example uses insurance document extraction and retail product classification. No model has been trained or benchmarked for this sample.

01 / The decision to make

Does an adapted model improve a defined business task enough to justify its total cost and operating requirements?

Insurance example

Extract agreed fields from policy documents, retain source references and flag ambiguous or missing information for specialist review.

Retail example

Classify products and extract agreed attributes from supplier descriptions, with exceptions routed to catalogue reviewers.

02 / Data readiness findings

Sources & permissions
Record origins, ownership and permitted training and evaluation uses.
Quality & coverage
Review labels, ambiguity, document or product families, language coverage and difficult cases.
Sensitive information
Identify data requiring minimisation and agree processing, access and retention boundaries.
Readiness decision
Record blockers, remediation actions, accountable owners and the conditions for proceeding.

03 / Evaluation design

Agree the baseline, acceptance criteria and a versioned dataset split before the experiment. Use training examples for adaptation, validation examples for model selection and held-out test examples for final evaluation.

04 / Results to collect

MeasureBaselineAdapted modelDecision criterion
Task accuracyNot measuredNot measuredAgreed field / label metric
Exception handlingNot measuredNot measuredAgreed escalation threshold
Response latencyNot measuredNot measuredAgreed target under load
Total operating costNot measuredNot measuredAgreed workload and cost assumptions

All result cells are intentionally unmeasured. This is a sample report format, not evidence of performance or savings.

05 / Failure cases & limitations

Include representative errors, missed exceptions, unsupported inputs and the limits of the dataset. State where human review remains necessary and where evidence is insufficient.

06 / Recommendation & handover

Recommend proceed, revise or stop against the agreed criteria. Record unresolved risks, data preparation needs, deployment dependencies, licensing and ownership terms, and the proposed next scope.

Start with one task and a written scope.

Review depth, deliverables, fees and timing are agreed before work begins. Performance comparisons require a separately scoped experiment.

Scope a readiness review